Any feedback?
Literature summary extracted from
- Phylogenetic and evolutionary analysis of functional divergence among Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) subfamilies (2015), Biol. Direct, 10, 49 .
Organism
| EC Number | Organism | UniProt | Comment | Textmining |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.4.19.13 | Bacillus anthracis | Q51693 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Bacillus subtilis | - |
- |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Bacillus subtilis BEST7613 | - |
- |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Escherichia coli | P18956 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Escherichia coli K12 | P18956 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Halalkalibacterium halodurans | - |
- |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Helicobacter pylori | Q9F5N9 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Homo sapiens | P19440 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Q05902 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 204508 | Q05902 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Thermoplasma acidophilum | Q9HJH4 | - |
- |
| 3.4.19.13 | Thermoplasma acidophilum ATCC 25905 | Q9HJH4 | - |
- |
General Information
| EC Number | General Information | Comment | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Bacillus subtilis |
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Halalkalibacterium halodurans |
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Homo sapiens |
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Escherichia coli |
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Helicobacter pylori |
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Bacillus anthracis |
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Thermoplasma acidophilum |
| 3.4.19.13 | evolution | phylogenetic analysis of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins from different organisms divides the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases into various clades and offers several interesting insights into the evolution and relatedness of these gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases. The present study focuses on the residues that are highly specific to each gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase subfamily and underlines their importance in imparting unique functional properties to the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase proteins of each clade. The present study highlights the clade specific variation in the GXXGG motif, where SP (XX) of bacterial gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases is substituted by VM, CA, AS in extremophilic bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes respectively, which could explain the differences in rates of enzyme reaction in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases of these clades as this motif is known to be involved in gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-substrate complex intermediate formation and the rate of final product release. Many sites predicted to be contributing to type 2 functional divergence are quite often found lining the substrate binding cavity and are close to the highly conserved known functional residues. This implies that they may be affecting the biochemical environment of the binding cavity and influencing the catalytic residues, thereby contributing to the functional differences among gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-like proteins of various clades | Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
| 3.4.19.13 | physiological function | the enzyme is a virulence factor | Helicobacter pylori |
| 3.4.19.13 | physiological function | the enzyme is a virulence factor | Bacillus anthracis |
Use of this online version of BRENDA is free under the CC BY 4.0 license. See terms of use for full details.
Release 2023.1 (January 2023)
Legal
Curated at
Member of
