Any feedback?
Please rate this page
(literature.php)
(0/150)

BRENDA support

Literature summary extracted from

  • Hochman, Y.; Zakim, D.
    A comparison of the kinetic properties of two different forms of microsomal UDPglucuronyltransferase (1983), J. Biol. Chem., 258, 4143-4146.
    View publication on PubMed

Activating Compound

EC Number Activating Compound Comment Organism Structure
2.4.1.17 Phospholipids activities of GT1P and GT2P are stimulated Sus scrofa

Localization

EC Number Localization Comment Organism GeneOntology No. Textmining
2.4.1.17 microsome
-
 Sus scrofa
-
-

Metals/Ions

EC Number Metals/Ions Comment Organism Structure
2.4.1.17 Mn2+ 2.5 mM, activation of GT1P form Sus scrofa

Organism

EC Number Organism UniProt Comment Textmining
2.4.1.17 Sus scrofa
-
 pig
-

Purification (Commentary)

EC Number Purification (Comment) Organism
2.4.1.17 overview procedures, two forms: GT1P and GT2P Sus scrofa

Source Tissue

EC Number Source Tissue Comment Organism Textmining
2.4.1.17 liver
-
 Sus scrofa
-

Storage Stability

EC Number Storage Stability Organism
2.4.1.17 -20°C, several months Sus scrofa

Substrates and Products (Substrate)

EC Number Substrates Comment Substrates Organism Products Comment (Products) Rev. Reac.
2.4.1.17 4-nitrophenol + UDP-glucuronate
-
 Sus scrofa 4-nitrophenyl beta-D-glucuronide + UDP
-
 ?

Temperature Stability [°C]

EC Number Temperature Stability Minimum [°C] Temperature Stability Maximum [°C] Comment Organism
2.4.1.17
-
-
 mixtures of enzyme and lipid, under stream of argon, stable at least 8 hours Sus scrofa