Any feedback?
Please rate this page
(literature.php)
(0/150)

BRENDA support

Literature summary for 3.4.23.16 extracted from

  • Fong, P.; McNamara, J.P.; Hillier, I.H.; Bryce, R.A.
    Assessment of QM/MM scoring functions for molecular docking to HIV-1 protease (2009), J. Chem. Inf. Model., 49, 913-924.
    View publication on PubMed

Inhibitors

Inhibitors Comment Organism Structure
additional information identification of the native pose of HIV-1 protease inhibitors by quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical models and comparison with the AMBER force field and ChemScore and GoldScore scoring functions. For the discrimination of native from non-native poses, solvent-corrected HF/6-31G:AMBER and AMBER functions exhibit the best overall performance. The electrostatic component of the MM and QM/MM functions appears important for discriminating the native pose of the ligand. There is no advantage to binding mode prediction by incorporating active site polarization at the PM3-D level. Choice of the protonation state of the aspartyl dyad in the HIV-1 protease active site influences the ability of scoring methods to determine the native binding pose Human immunodeficiency virus 1

Organism

Organism UniProt Comment Textmining
Human immunodeficiency virus 1
-
-
-