Please wait a moment until all data is loaded. This message will disappear when all data is loaded.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
ATP + H2O + folded 5(6)-carboxytetramethylrhodamine-tagged bacteriorhodopsin peptide
ADP + phosphate + unfolded 5(6)-carboxytetramethylrhodamine-tagged bacteriorhodopsin peptide
-
i.e. 5(6)-carboxytetramethylrhodamine-KKAITTLVPAIAFTMYLSMLLKK
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
bovine rhodanese
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
pig heart malate dehydrogenase
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
ATP is an allosteric ligand for GroEL, its binding promoting both cooperative (intra-ring) and anti-cooperative (inter-ring) actions. ATP serves as a substrate, undergoing hydrolysis during the reaction cycle to promote a unidirectional advance of the machine. Inter-ring contacts in the ATPase cycle, modeling, overview
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
GroEL is an ATP-driven macromolecular machine. GroEL and its bound cofactor GroES undergo an ATP-regulated interaction cycle that serves to close and open the folding cage. In the asymmetric reaction mode, only one ring of GroEL is GroES bound and the two rings function sequentially, coupled by negative allostery. In the symmetric mode, both GroEL rings are GroES bound and are folding active simultaneously. GroEL:GroES stoichiometry calculation: symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes are substantially populated only in the presence of non-foldable model proteins, such as alpha-lactalbumin and alpha-casein, which overstimulate the GroEL ATPase and uncouple the negative GroEL inter-ring allostery. In contrast, asymmetric complexes are dominant both in the absence of substrate and in the presence of foldable substrate proteins. Upon binding of ATP to GroEL, GroES caps the GroEL ring that holds the substrate (cis-ring), resulting in its displacement into an enclosed chamber large enough for proteins up to 60 kDa
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
654461, 654810, 654945, 669221, 699525, 719957, 733278, 733538, 733876, 734278, 735006, 735322, 750069, 751195, 751329, 752285 -
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
-
ir
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
aconitase B, bind transiently to GroEL and probably doesn´t require ATP and GroES
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
MetE, bind transiently to GroEL and probably doesn´t require ATP and GroES
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
aconitase, requires GroEL, co-chaperonin GroES and ATP for complete folding
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
assay at 24°C
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
assay at pH 7.4, 23°C, 5 min
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
beta-galactosidase, bind transiently to GroEL and probably doesn´t require ATP and GroES
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
decarboxylase component E1, requires GroEL, co-chaperonin GroES and ATP for complete folding
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
dependent on protein if ATP release substrate from GroEL or if complete chaperonin system GroEL-GroES and ATP is required
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
green fluorescent protein, requires GroEL, co-chaperonin GroES and ATP for complete folding
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
high affinity in taut state
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
malate dehydrogenase
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
maltodextrin glucosidase, requires GroEL, co-chaperonin GroES and ATP for complete folding
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
P22 tail spike protein, interacts with GroEL and gets released by action of nucleotide alone
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
phytochrome photoreceptor, interacts with GroEL and gets released by action of nucleotide alone
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
rhodanese
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
RUBISCO, requires GroEL, co-chaperonin GroES and ATP for complete folding
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
strong binding peptide
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
strong binding peptide W2DP6V
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
folding of the model substrate HippelLindau tumor suppressor protein VHL in an ATP-dependent manner. Heterogeneity of the action of GroES/EL on a bound polypeptide substrate might arise from the random nature of the specific binding to the various identical subunits of GroEL, and might help explain why multiple rounds of binding and hydrolysis are required for some chaperonin substrates
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
the equilibrium and kinetics of MgATP2- binding to GroEL mutant Y485W is studied via isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy. Comparison of the kinetics in the absence and presence of K+ clearly demonstrate that the first fluorescence-increasing phase corresponds to bimolecular MgATP2- binding to GroEL
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
the GroEL/GroES protein folding chamber is formed and dissociated by ATP binding and hydrolysis. ATP hydrolysis in the GroES-bound (cis) ring gates entry of ATP into the opposite unoccupied trans ring, which allosterically ejects cis ligands. ADP release from the cis ring is not the rate-limiting step of the GroEL/GroES reaction cycle
-
-
?
ATP + H2O + a folded polypeptide
ADP + phosphate + an unfolded polypeptide
-
GroEL, non-native protein, and GroES undergo ATP-regulated binding and release cycles
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
the presence of non-native substrate protein alters the GroEL/ES reaction by shifting it from asymmetric to symmetric complexes. Substrate proteins are mutant maltose binding protein, Rhodospirillium rubrum ribulose-1,5-bisphosphat-carboxylase/-oxygenase, mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial rhodanese, alpha-lactalbumin, and alpha-casein
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
enzyme catalyzes refolding of denatured malate dehydrogenase into the active form
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone. The presence of single or multiple GroES mobile looplike hydrophobic patches in the amino acid sequence seems to be a foremost criterion for a protein to be recognized by GroEL. The hydrophobic region on the protein must also be exposed in its nonnative form so that it can interact with the peptide-binding region on the GroELs apical domain
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
GroEL binds only one molecule of the model substrate Rubisco. In contrast, the capsid protein of bacteriophage T4, a natural GroEL substrate, can occupy both rings simultaneously. Each substrate induces distinct conformational changes in the GroEL chaperonin. Binding of Rubisco to the GroEL oligomer stabilizes the chaperonin complex significantly, whereas binding of one capsid protein does not have the same effect. Addition of a second capsid protein molecule to GroEL results in a similar stabilizing effect to that obtained after the binding of a single Rubisco. The binding of a single capsid polypeptide does not induce significant conformational changes in the GroEL trans ring, and hence the unoccupied GroEL ring remains accessible for a second capsid molecule
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
GroEL interacts strongly with the enzyme rhodanese undergoing thermal unfolding at 43°C. The enzyme forms a binary complex. Active rhodanese (82%) could be recovered by releasing the enzyme from GroEL after the addition of several components, e.g. ATP and the co-chaperonin GroES. The inability to recover active enzyme at 43°C from the GroELrhodanese complex is not due to the disruption of the complex or aggregation of rhodanese, but rather to the partial loss of its ATPase activity and/or to the inability of rhodanese to be released from GroEL due to a conformational change
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
GroES-assisted refolding of unfolded zinc-cytochrome c takes place by a mechanism that is quite close to the Anfinsen Cage hypothesis for molecular chaperone activity. Even in the presence of ATP, GroEL/GroES-assisted refolding of ZnCyt c takes place at approximately half the rate of refolding of ZnCyt c alone. All forward rate enhancements or reductions could be accounted for in terms of thermodynamic coupling due to binding interactions between GroEL and unfolded protein substrates,driven by thermodynamic considerations. It is proposed that passive kinetic partitioning should be considered the core mechanism of the GroEL/GroES molecular chaperone machinery, wherein the core function is to bind unfolded protein substrates leading to a blockade of aggregation pathways and to increases in molecular flux through productive folding pathways
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
the bound state of isotope-labeled human dihydrofolate reductase includes random coil conformations devoid of stable native-likle tertiary contacts and may be best described as a dynamic ensemble of randomly structured conformers
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
GroEL-GroES interaction is analyzed: using a unique strategy to create GroES variants with various affinities for GroEL a direct role of GroES in facilitating substrate folding through its dynamics with GroEL is indicated
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
malate dehydrogenase and rhodanase are substrate proteins for GroEl refolding
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
the GroEL/ES system promotes protein folding, mechanism overview
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
the apical GroEL domain (residues 191-376) binds cofactor non-native substrate protein, helices H (residues 233-243) and I (residues 255-267) of the apical domains expose multiple hydrophobic amino acids towards the ring center, forming a circular surface for the binding of a non- native substrate protein, GroEL/ES cycling in the presence of substrate, overview. The C-terminal Gly-Gly-Met repeat sequences are also required for accelerated folding
-
-
?
additional information
?
-
-
the refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese is catalyzed by the wild-type enzyme, and also at low temperatures by oxidized GroEL, which contains increased exposed hydrophobic surfaces and retains its ability to hydrolyse ATP. Oxidized GroEL efficiently binds the urea-unfolded rhodanese at 4°C, without requiring excess amount of chaperonin relative to normal GroEL (i.e. non-oxidized). The loss of the ATPase activity of oxidized GroEL at 4°C prevents the release of rhodanese from the GroEL-rhodanese complex
-
-
?
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
malfunction
-
a wider range of newly synthesized proteins aggregated upon rapid loss of GroEL function in a temperature-sensitive GroEL mutant strain. Most GroEL interactors are 35-60 kDa in size, consistent with the volume of the GroEL-GroES cavity. Role of chaperonin in evolution, overview
metabolism
the enzyme helps protein folding by undergoing a conformational change from a closed state to an open state
physiological function
chaperonin GroEL is a protein folding machine. Chaperonins are intricate allosteric machines formed of two back-to-back, stacked rings of subunits presenting end cavities lined with hydrophobic binding sites for nonnative polypeptides. Once bound, substrates are subjected to forceful, concerted movements that result in their ejection from the binding surface and simultaneous encapsulation inside a hydrophilic chamber that favors their folding
physiological function
the chaperonin GroEL and its cofactor GroES have an essential function in folding a subset of proteins in the bacterial cytosol. GroEL is an ATP-driven macromolecular machine
evolution
-
the bacterial chaperonin GroEL, with its lid-like cofactor GroES, is the archetypical member of the class of protein folding machines. GroEL belongs to the chaperonins of group I, which are found in bacteria as well as in mitochondria and chloroplasts, the eukaryotic organelles that descend from bacterial endosymbionts
evolution
-
the chaperonins are a family of molecular chaperones present in all three kingdoms of life. They are classified into group I and group II. Group I consists of the bacterial variants (GroEL) and the eukaryotic ones from mitochondria and chloroplasts (Hsp60). Both groups assemble into a dual ring structure, with each ring providing a protective folding chamber for nascent and denatured proteins
physiological function
-
protein stability is a major constraint in protein evolution. Buffering mechanisms such as chaperonins are key in alleviating this constraint
physiological function
-
the double ring-shaped chaperonin GroEL binds a wide range of non-native polypeptides within its central cavity and, together with its cofactor GroES, assists their folding in an ATP-dependent manner
physiological function
-
the chaperonin functional cycle is powered by ATP binding and hydrolysis, which drives a series of structural rearrangements that enable encapsulation and subsequent release of the substrate protein. Chaperonins have elaborate allosteric mechanisms to regulate their functional cycle. Long-range negative cooperativity between the two rings ensures alternation of the folding chambers. Positive intra-ring cooperativity, which facilitates concerted conformational transitions within the protein subunits of one ring, has only been demonstrated for group I chaperonins
physiological function
-
the chaperonin GroEL binds to non-native substrate proteins via hydrophobic interactions, preventing their aggregation, which is minimized at low temperatures
physiological function
-
the GroEL-GroES chaperonin machine is a nano-cage for protein folding. GroEL, non-native protein, and GroES undergo ATP-regulated binding and release cycles. GroEL/ES is required for Escherichia coli growth under all conditions, indicating the existence of essential proteins that depend on the chaperonin for folding. While GroEL interacts with a wide range of denatured proteins in vitro, only a limited set of 250 proteins bind stably to GroEL upon translation in vivo, corresponding to about 10% of total Escherichia coli cytosolic proteins and including 67 essential proteins
additional information
the allosteric machine movements are choreographed by ATP binding, which triggers concerted tilting and twisting of subunit domains. These movements distort the ring of hydrophobic binding sites and split it apart, potentially unfolding the multiply bound substrate, structural nature of the allosteric action of this double-ring machine. ATP is an allosteric ligand for GroEL, its binding promoting both cooperative (intra-ring) and anti-cooperative (inter-ring) actions. Each equatorial domain houses an ATP binding pocket, and seven of these domains contact each other side by side in each ring. The two rings contact each other back to back in a staggered fashion across the equatorial plane, forming a platform on which the other two domains of the machine undergo major movements in response to ATP binding and hydrolysis The equatorial domains themselves also undergo subtle cooperative movements during the reaction cycle, responsible for the asymmetric behavior of the machine, dictating that only one ring is folding active at a time. GroELuses its apical domains and central cavity, remote from the ATP binding pocket, to supply kinetic assistance to polypeptide folding, allosteric structural changes in an ATP-bound GroEL ring, detailed structure-function and kinetic analysis, overview
additional information
the chaperonin GroEL, a cylindrical complex consisting of two stacked heptameric rings, and its lid-like cofactor GroES form a nano-cage in which a single polypeptide chain is transiently enclosed and allowed to fold unimpaired by aggregation. Uncoupling of the GroEL rings and formation of symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes is suppressed at physiological ATP:ADP concentration. The asymmetric GroEL:GroES complex represents the main folding active form of the chaperonin. Catalytic mechanism and structure-fucntion relationship, overview
additional information
-
cavity closure is triggered by ATP binding
additional information
-
chaperonins are large ring shaped oligomers that facilitate protein folding by encapsulation within a central cavity. All chaperonins possess flexible C-termini which protrude from the equatorial domain of each subunit into the central cavity. The termini play an important role in the allosteric regulation of the ATPase cycle, in substrate folding and in complex assembly and stability, the termini undergo a heretofore unappreciated conformational cycle which is coupled to the nucleotide state of the enzyme, localization of the termini throughout the nucleotide cycle of the group I chaperonin GroE, molecular dynamics simulations, overview. GroE consists of the GroEL complex, an (alpha7)2 homoligomer with a dual-ring topology, and its homoheptameric cofactor, GroES, which acts as a lid for the GroEL folding chamber
additional information
-
enzyme residues Asp398 and Asp52 play a critical role for ATP hydrolysis of GroEL
additional information
-
mechanisms and the structure-function relationships in the complex protein systems, structural dynamics, allostery, and associated conformational rearrangements, overview
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
A109C
the mutant is defective in ring separation and exchange
A109S
the mutant shows mixed-ring formation like the wild type enzyme
C138S/C458S/C519S/D83C/K327C
conformational change, in reduced state similar ATP hydrolysis and ATP binding to wild-type GroEL
D155A
the mutant preserves negative inter-ring cooperativity and forms mixed-ring complexes in the presence of cofactor GroES/ATP with an efficiency similar to the wild type enzyme
D155A/R197A
the double mutant preserves negative inter-ring cooperativity and forms mixed-ring complexes in the presence of cofactor GroES/ATP with an efficiency similar to the wild type enzyme
D398K
block of ATP hydrolysis
D52A/D358A
ATPase-deficient mutant
D52A/D398A
site-directed mutagenesis
D83A/R197A
allosterically compromised mutant
D87K
the mutant enzyme does not bind nucleotide
E315C
site-directed mutagenesis
EL398A/D490C
conformational change, mutant of GroEL
F44W
site-directed mutagenesis, slower phases following addition of ATP to tryptophan-modified GroEL mutant
I493C
mutation in binding pocket of GroEL
K105A
allosterically compromised mutant
R231W
site-directed mutagenesis, apical domain mutation, slower phases following addition of ATP to tryptophan-modified GroEL mutant
Y199E
conformational change, reduced affinity for GroES
Y203E
conformational change, single mutation of GroEL
Y203E/G337S/I349E
the mutant enzyme is ATPase active but unable to bind substrate protein and the cofactor GroES
Y360F
conformational change, single mutation of GroEL
Y476F
conformational change, single mutation of GroEL
Y478F
conformational change, single mutation of GroEL
Y485F
conformational change, single mutation of GroEL
Y485W
site-directed mutagenesis, equatorial ring mutation, slower phases following addition of ATP to tryptophan-modified GroEL mutant
Y506E
conformational change, single mutation of GroEL
Y506W
conformational change, single mutation of GroEL
A399T
-
site-diretected mutagenesis, the mutation weakens the affinity for GroES by about 90fold
A92T
-
site-diretected mutagenesis, the mutation weakens the affinity for GroES by about 1600fold
C138W
-
at 37°C, the mutant enzyme is indistinguishable in all aspects from the wild type, however, at 25°C, steric hindrances cause the chaperonin to be arrested in a ternary complex form, with both unfolded protein and GroES bound to the same ring of the enzyme. An increase in temperature to more than 30°C is sufficient to restart both target protein refolding and ATPase activity in the mutant enzyme
D115N
-
site-diretected mutagenesis, the mutation weakens the affinity for GroES by about 50fold
D52A
-
site-directed mutagenesis, ATPase activity of the mutant is 80% reduced compared to the wild-type GroEL
D52A/D398A
-
site-directed mutagenesis, the mutant forms a stable symmetric GroEL-GroES complex with a half-life of 150 h, but has no ATPase activity
E191G
-
site-diretected mutagenesis, the mutation weakens the affinity for GroES by about 300fold
EL-2GGM4
-
cavity size mutant, cis-cavity volume 96%, net charge -42
EL-2GGM4-D398A
-
ATPase deficient mutant
EL-3GGM4
-
cavity size mutant, cis-cavity volume 91%, net charge -42
EL-3GGM4-D398A
-
ATPase deficient mutant
EL-3N3Q
-
charge mutant, cis-cavity volume 100%, net charge 0
EL-4GGM4
-
cavity size mutant, cis-cavity volume 87%, net charge -42
EL-KKK2
-
charge mutant, cis-cavity volume 100%, net charge 0
EL-NNQ
-
charge mutant, cis-cavity volume 100%, net charge -21
ELDELTAC
-
cavity size mutant, cis-cavity volume 104%, net charge -42
F44W
-
wild-type variant in which the F44W mutation is introduced so that ATP-induced conformation changes can be followed by monitoring time-resolved changes in fluorescence
F44W/E257A
-
the mutation E257A abolishes the nonfolded protein substrate binding-induced stimulation of ATPase activity
G192W
-
the mutant enzyme is capable of binding to GroES in the absence of ATP binding
I493C
-
normal ATP hydrolysis in absence of inhibitor
Y485W
-
mutant is used in this study to monitor the MgATP2-binding process to unliganded apo GroEL in the absence of K+ at pH 7.5 and 5.1°C. Under these conditions ATP exists mostly as MgATP2- and [MgATP2-]
D398A
conformational change, slow ATP hydrolysis
D398A
the mutant enzyme binds ATP but hydrolyzes it at a very slow rate of less than 2% of the wild type enzyme
E461K
site-directed mutagenesis, the inactive mutant of GroEL has a rearranged inter-ring interface, the normal 1:2 contacts of apposed equatorial domains in wild-type GroEL are replaced by 1:1 contacts in the mutant in the interfaces
E461K
the mutant enzyme shows no mixed-ring formation
D398A
-
ATPase deficient mutant
D398A
-
to explore the multiple conformations induced upon ATP binding to GroEL a mutant is used. Mutant shows normal ATP binding but 3% of the wild-type steady-state ATPase activity. Statistical analysis of a large data set of single-particle cryo-EM images of mutant is carried out: multiple pre-hydrolysis conformations are resolved that can be ordered into a sequence to trace out smooth trajectories of domain movements for GroEL-ATP7 and GroEL-ATP14 complexes. The structures reveal a set of salt-bridge changes that provide a series of click stops (preferred conformations) on a trajectory to a conformation in which the apical domains are separated from each other and partially elevated but lack the full elevation and large clockwise twist seen in the GroES bound rings. This elevated, open conformation of the GroEL ring positions the GroES-binding sites on its apical surface, while still exposing key hydrophobic sites toward the cavity
D398A
-
to measure the rate of ADP release from an asymmetric GroEL/GroES/ADP7 complex, D398A mutant is employed. The mutant hydrolyzes ATP at a rate 2% that of wild-type GroEL, and thus effectively allows study of a single turnover of the reaction
D398A
-
site-directed mutagenesis, the mutant shows reduced ATPase activity compared to the wild-type enzyme
D398A
-
ATP-hydrolysis deficient mutant
additional information
-
used in complex with gp23 and gp31 of bacteriophage T4
additional information
-
construction of a single-ring GroELSR. GroELSRA399T-GroES and GroELSRD115N-GroES single-ring systems support cell growth in the same manner as the wild-type double-ring GroELeGroES at 37°C and 42°C, while mutant GroELSRA92T-GroES complements GroEL-GroES at both 37°C and 42°C, and mutant GroELSRE191G-GroES complements GroEL-GroES to a lesser extent at 37°C, but not at 42°C. Activities of functional single-ring GroELSReGroES system mutants, overview
additional information
-
the refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese is catalzed at low temperatures by oxidized GroEL, which contains increased exposed hydrophobic surfaces and retains its ability to hydrolyse ATP, oxidation of GroEL with H2O2. Oxidized GroEL efficiently binds the urea-unfolded rhodanese at 4°C, without requiring excess amount of chaperonin relative to normal GroEL (i.e. non-oxidized). The oxidized GroEL has the potential to efficiently trap recombinant or non-native proteins at 4°C and release them at higher temperatures under appropriate conditions
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Please wait a moment until the data is sorted. This message will disappear when the data is sorted.
Higurashi, T.; Nosaka, K.; Mizobata, T.; Nagai, J.; Kawata, Y.
Unfolding and refolding of Escherichia coli chaperonin GroES is expressed by a three-state model
J. Mol. Biol.
291
703-713
1999
Escherichia coli
brenda
Martin, J.
Role of the GroEL chaperonin intermediate domain in coupling ATP hydrolysis to polypeptide release
J. Biol. Chem.
273
7351-7357
1998
Escherichia coli
brenda
Ranson, N.A.; White, H.E.; Saibil, H.R.
Chaperonins
Biochem. J.
333
233-242
1998
Escherichia coli
brenda
Dubaquie, Y.; Loosers, R.; Rospert, S.
Significance of chaperonin 10-mediated inhibition of ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94
9011-9016
1997
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia coli
brenda
Mendoza, J.A.; Warren, T.; Dulin, P.
The ATPase activity of chaperonin GroEL is highly stimulated at elevated temperatures
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
229
271-274
1996
Escherichia coli
brenda
Cross, S.J.; Cirulea, A.; Poomputsa, K.; Romaniec, M.P.; Freedman, R.B.
Thermostable chaperonin from Clostridium thermocellum
Biochem. J.
316
615-622
1996
Acetivibrio thermocellus, Escherichia coli
brenda
Roseman, A.M.; Chen, S.; White, H.; Braig, K.; Saibil, H.R.
The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL
Cell
87
241-251
1996
Escherichia coli
brenda
Diamant, S.; Azem, A.; Weiss, C.; Gouloubinoff, P.
Effect of free and ATP-bound magnesium and manganese ions on the ATPase activity of chaperonin GroEL
Biochemistry
34
273-277
1995
Escherichia coli
brenda
Todd, M.J.; Lorimer, G.H.
Stability of the asymmetric Escherichia coli chaperonin complex
J. Biol. Chem.
270
5388-5394
1995
Escherichia coli
brenda
Yifrach, O.; Horovitz, A.
Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL
Biochemistry
34
5303-5308
1995
Escherichia coli
brenda
Todd, M.J.; Viitanen, P.V.; Lorimer, G.H.
Dynamics of the cochaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding
Science
265
659-666
1994
Escherichia coli
brenda
Terlesky K.C.; Tabita, F.R.
Purification and characterization of the chaperonin 10 and chaperonin 60 proteins from Rhodobacter sphaeroides
Biochemistry
30
8181-8186
1991
Escherichia coli, Cereibacter sphaeroides
brenda
Viitanen, P.V.; Lubben, T.H.; Reed, J.; Goloubinoff, P.; O'Keefe, D.P.; Lorimer, G.H.
Chaperonin-facilitated refolding of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase and ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60 (groel) are K+ dependent
Biochemistry
29
5665-5671
1990
Escherichia coli
brenda
George, R.; Kelly, S.M.; Price, N.C.; Erbse, A.; Fisher, M.; Lund, P.A.
Three GroEL homologues from Rhizobium leguminosarum have distinct in vitro properties
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
324
822-828
2004
Escherichia coli, Rhizobium leguminosarum
brenda
Inobe, T.; Makio, T.; Takasu-Ishikawa, E.; Terada, T.P.; Kuwajima, K.
Nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL: non-cooperative binding of ATP analogs and ADP, and cooperative effect of ATP
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1545
160-173
2001
Escherichia coli
brenda
Melkani, G.C.; Zardeneta, G.; Mendoza, J.A.
The ATPase activity of GroEL is supported at high temperatures by divalent cations that stabilize its structure
BioMetals
16
479-484
2003
Escherichia coli
brenda
Chaudhuri, T.K.; Gupta, P.
Factors governing the substrate recognition by GroEL chaperone: a sequence correlation approach
Cell Stress Chaperones
10
24-36
2005
Escherichia coli
brenda
Melkani, G.C.; Zardeneta, G.; Mendoza, J.A.
On the chaperonin activity of GroEL at heat-shock temperature
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
37
1375-1385
2005
Escherichia coli
brenda
van Duijn, E.; Simmons, D.A.; van den Heuvel, R.H.; Bakkes, P.J.; van Heerikhuizen, H.; Heeren, R.M.; Robinson, C.V.; van der Vies, S.M.; Heck, A.J.
Tandem mass spectrometry of intact GroEL-substrate complexes reveals substrate-specific conformational changes in the trans ring
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
128
4694-4702
2006
Escherichia coli
brenda
Khor, H.K.; Fisher, M.T.; Schoeneich, C.
Potential role of methionine sulfoxide in the inactivation of the chaperone GroEL by hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and peroxynitrite(ONOO-)
J. Biol. Chem.
279
19486-19493
2004
Escherichia coli
brenda
Chaudhry, C.; Horwich, A.L.; Brunger, A.T.; Adams, P.D.
Exploring the structural dynamics of the E. coli chaperonin GroEL using translation-libration-screw crystallographic refinement of intermediate states
J. Mol. Biol.
342
229-245
2004
Escherichia coli
brenda
Bartolucci, C.; Lamba, D.; Grazulis, S.; Manakova, E.; Heumann, H.
Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL
J. Mol. Biol.
354
940-951
2005
Escherichia coli
brenda
Cabo-Bilbao, A.; Spinelli, S.; Sot, B.; Agirre, J.; Mechaly, A.E.; Muga, A.; Guerin, D.M.
Crystal structure of the temperature-sensitive and allosteric-defective chaperonin GroELE461K
J. Struct. Biol.
155
482-492
2006
Escherichia coli
brenda
Jones, H.; Preuss, M.; Wright, M.; Miller, A.D.
The mechanism of GroEL/GroES folding/refolding of protein substrates revisited
Org. Biomol. Chem.
4
1223-1235
2006
Escherichia coli
brenda
Horst, R.; Bertelsen, E.B.; Fiaux, J.; Wider, G.; Horwich, A.L.; Wuethrich, K.
Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102
12748-12753
2005
Escherichia coli
brenda
Panda, M.; Horowitz, P.M.
Activation parameters for the spontaneous and pressure-induced phases of the dissociation of single-ring GroEL (SR1) chaperonin
Protein J.
23
85-94
2004
Escherichia coli
brenda
Melkani, G.C.; Sielaff, R.L.; Zardeneta, G.; Mendoza, J.A.
Divalent cations stabilize GroEL under conditions of oxidative stress
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
368
625-630
2008
Escherichia coli
brenda
Tang, Y.C.; Chang, H.C.; Chakraborty, K.; Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M.
Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo
EMBO J.
27
1458-1468
2008
Escherichia coli
brenda
Bonshtien, A.L.; Weiss, C.; Vitlin, A.; Niv, A.; Lorimer, G.H.; Azem, A.
Significance of the N-terminal domain for the function of chloroplast cpn20 chaperonin
J. Biol. Chem.
282
4463-4469
2007
Escherichia coli
brenda
Bross, P.; Naundrup, S.; Hansen, J.; Nielsen, M.N.; Christensen, J.H.; Kruh?ffer, M.; Palmfeldt, J.; Corydon, T.J.; Gregersen, N.; Ang, D.; Georgopoulos, C.; Nielsen, K.L.
The Hsp60-(p.V98I) mutation associated with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia SPG13 compromises chaperonin function both in vitro and in vivo
J. Biol. Chem.
283
15694-15700
2008
Escherichia coli, Homo sapiens
brenda
Danziger, O.; Shimon, L.; Horovitz, A.
Glu257 in GroEL is a sensor involved in coupling polypeptide substrate binding to stimulation of ATP hydrolysis
Protein Sci.
15
1270-1276
2006
Escherichia coli
brenda
Chapman, E.; Farr, G.W.; Furtak, K.; Horwich, A.L.
A small molecule inhibitor selective for a variant ATP-binding site of the chaperonin GroEL
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
19
811-813
2009
Escherichia coli (P0A6F5)
brenda
Li, Y.; Gao, X.; Chen, L.
GroEL Recognizes an amphipathic helix and binds to the hydrophobic side
J. Biol. Chem.
284
4324-4331
2009
Escherichia coli
brenda
Tehver, R.; Thirumalai, D.
Kinetic model for the coupling between allosteric transitions in GroEL and substrate protein folding and aggregation
J. Mol. Biol.
377
1279-1295
2008
Escherichia coli
brenda
Clare, D.K.; Bakkes, P.J.; van Heerikhuizen, H.; van der Vies, S.M.; Saibil, H.R.
Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber
Nature
457
107-110
2009
Tequatrovirus T4, Escherichia coli
brenda
Grason, J.P.; Gresham, J.S.; Lorimer, G.H.
Setting the chaperonin timer: a two-stroke, two-speed, protein machine
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105
17339-17344
2008
Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli JM105
brenda
Chapman, E.; Farr, G.W.; Fenton, W.A.; Johnson, S.M.; Horwich, A.L.
Requirement for binding multiple ATPs to convert a GroEL ring to the folding-active state
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105
19205-19210
2008
Escherichia coli
brenda
Chaudhuri, T.K.; Verma, V.K.; Maheshwari, A.
GroEL assisted folding of large polypeptide substrates in Escherichia coli: Present scenario and assignments for the future
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
99
42-50
2009
Escherichia coli
brenda
Hosono, K.; Ueno, T.; Taguchi, H.; Motojima, F.; Zako, T.; Yoshida, M.; Funatsu, T.
Kinetic analysis of conformational changes of GroEL based on the fluorescence of tyrosine 506
Protein J.
27
461-468
2008
Escherichia coli (P0A6F5)
brenda
Kim, S.Y.; Miller, E.J.; Frydman, J.; Moerner, W.E.
Action of the chaperonin GroEL/ES on a non-native substrate observed with single-molecule FRET
J. Mol. Biol.
401
553-563
2010
Escherichia coli
brenda
Tokuriki, N.; Tawfik, D.S.
Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution
Nature
459
668-673
2009
Escherichia coli
brenda
Clare, D.K.; Vasishtan, D.; Stagg, S.; Quispe, J.; Farr, G.W.; Topf, M.; Horwich, A.L.; Saibil, H.R.
ATP-triggered conformational changes delineate substrate-binding and -folding mechanics of the GroEL chaperonin
Cell
149
113-123
2012
Escherichia coli
brenda
Tyagi, N.K.; Fenton, W.A.; Horwich, A.L.
ATP-triggered ADP release from the asymmetric chaperonin GroEL/GroES/ADP7 is not the rate-limiting step of the GroEL/GroES reaction cycle
FEBS Lett.
584
951-953
2010
Escherichia coli
brenda
Illingworth, M.; Ramsey, A.; Zheng, Z.; Chen, L.
Stimulating the substrate folding activity of a single ring GroEL variant by modulating the cochaperonin GroES
J. Biol. Chem.
286
30401-30408
2011
Escherichia coli
brenda
Chen, J.; Makabe, K.; Nakamura, T.; Inobe, T.; Kuwajima, K.
Dissecting a bimolecular process of MgATP2- binding to the chaperonin GroEL
J. Mol. Biol.
410
343-356
2011
Escherichia coli
brenda
Illingworth, M.; Salisbury, J.; Li, W.; Lin, D.; Chen, L.
Effective ATPase activity and moderate chaperonin-cochaperonin interaction are important for the functional single-ring chaperonin system
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
466
15-20
2015
Escherichia coli
brenda
Melkani, G.C.; Sielaff, R.; Zardeneta, G.; Mendoza, J.A.
Interaction of oxidized chaperonin GroEL with an unfolded protein at low temperatures
Biosci. Rep.
32
299-303
2012
Escherichia coli
brenda
Skjaerven, L.; Cuellar, J.; Martinez, A.; Valpuesta, J.M.
Dynamics, flexibility, and allostery in molecular chaperonins
FEBS Lett.
589
2522-2532
2015
Escherichia coli
brenda
Koike-Takeshita, A.; Mitsuoka, K.; Taguchi, H.
Asp-52 in combination with Asp-398 plays a critical role in ATP hydrolysis of chaperonin GroEL
J. Biol. Chem.
289
30005-30011
2014
Escherichia coli
brenda
Saibil, H.R.; Fenton, W.A.; Clare, D.K.; Horwich, A.L.
Structure and allostery of the chaperonin GroEL
J. Mol. Biol.
425
1476-1487
2013
Escherichia coli (P0A6F5)
brenda
Haldar, S.; Gupta, A.J.; Yan, X.; Milicic, G.; Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M.
Chaperonin-assisted protein folding: relative population of asymmetric and symmetric GroEL:GroES complexes
J. Mol. Biol.
427
2244-2255
2015
Escherichia coli (P0A6F5)
brenda
Dalton, K.M.; Frydman, J.; Pande, V.S.
The dynamic conformational cycle of the group I chaperonin C-termini revealed via molecular dynamics simulation
PLoS ONE
10
e0117724
2015
Escherichia coli
brenda
Hayer-Hartl, M.; Bracher, A.; Hartl, F.U.
The GroEL-GroES chaperonin machine: a nano-cage for protein folding
Trends Biochem. Sci.
41
62-76
2016
Escherichia coli
brenda
Suzuki, Y.; Yura, K.
Conformational shift in the closed state of GroEL induced by ATP-binding triggers a transition to the open state
Biophys. Physicobiol.
13
127-134
2016
Escherichia coli (Q548M1)
brenda
Mizobata, T.; Kawata, Y.
The versatile mutational repertoire of Escherichia coli GroEL, a multidomain chaperonin nanomachine
Biophys. Rev.
10
631-640
2018
Escherichia coli
brenda
Yan, X.; Shi, Q.; Bracher, A.; Milicic, G.; Singh, A.K.; Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M.
GroEL ring separation and exchange in the chaperonin reaction
Cell
172
605-617.e11
2018
Escherichia coli (P0A6F5)
brenda
Molugu, S.K.; Li, J.; Bernal, R.A.
Separation of E. coli chaperonin groEL from beta-galactosidase without denaturation
J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.
1007
93-99
2015
Escherichia coli
brenda
Yamamoto, D.; Ando, T.
Chaperonin GroEL-GroES functions as both alternating and non-alternating engines
J. Mol. Biol.
428
3090-3101
2016
Escherichia coli
brenda
Lorimer, G.H.; Fei, X.; Ye, X.
The GroEL chaperonin a protein machine with pistons driven by ATP binding and hydrolysis
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
373
20170179
2018
Escherichia coli (P0A6F5)
brenda
Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Lu, X.; Chi, H.; Li, S.; Huang, F.
Probing the interaction mechanisms between transmembrane peptides and the chaperonin GroEL with fluorescence anisotropy
Spectrochim. Acta A.Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.
194
1-7
2018
Escherichia coli
brenda
Boshoff, A.
Chaperonin-co-chaperonin interactions
Subcell. Biochem.
78
153-178
2015
Escherichia coli
brenda