Any feedback?
Please rate this page
(all_enzymes.php)
(0/150)

BRENDA support

1.5.3.14: polyamine oxidase (propane-1,3-diamine-forming)

This is an abbreviated version!
For detailed information about polyamine oxidase (propane-1,3-diamine-forming), go to the full flat file.

Word Map on EC 1.5.3.14

Reaction

spermidine
+
O2
+
H2O
=
propane-1,3-diamine
+
4-aminobutanal
+
H2O2

Synonyms

EC 1.5.3.11, flavin-containing polyamine oxidase, maize PAO, maize polyamine oxidase, MPAO, OsPAO7, PAO, ZmPAO

ECTree

     1 Oxidoreductases
         1.5 Acting on the CH-NH group of donors
             1.5.3 With oxygen as acceptor
                1.5.3.14 polyamine oxidase (propane-1,3-diamine-forming)

General Information

General Information on EC 1.5.3.14 - polyamine oxidase (propane-1,3-diamine-forming)

Please wait a moment until all data is loaded. This message will disappear when all data is loaded.
GENERAL INFORMATION
ORGANISM
UNIPROT
COMMENTARY hide
LITERATURE
malfunction
-
the ZmPAO-K300M mutant is catalytically impaired with a 1400fold decrease in the rate of flavin reduction. Substrates are bound in an out-of-register mode and the HOH309 water molecule is absent in the enzyme-substrate complexes. K300 mutation brings about a 60 mV decrease in the FAD redox potential and a 30fold decrease in the FAD reoxidation rate, within a virtually unaltered geometry of the catalytic pocket
physiological function
additional information
-
active site structure of wild-type and mutant K300M enzymes, overview. The active site is formed by a catalytic tunnel in which the N5 atom of FAD lies in close proximity to the K300 side chain, the only active-site residue conserved in all PAOs. A water molecule, HOH309, is hydrogen-bound to the amino group of K300. The HOH309-K300 couple plays a major role in multiple steps of ZmPAO catalytic mechanism, such as correct substrate binding geometry as well as FAD reduction and reoxidation kinetics. Substrate binding mechanism and structure, and comparison to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fms1, EC 1.5.3.17, overview. The differences include a planar conformation of the isoalloxazine ring in Fms1 versus a highly bent conformation in ZmPAO and important substitutions in the relevant topological positions of the active site, i.e. E170W, F171H, E62H, V196N, S87D, F318K, F403Y, V331F, T348L, Y169L and Y298L, numbering referring to ZmPAO. The substrate-binding site of Fms1 is more hydrophobic than that of ZmPAO